Why Build a Logger?
It has come to my attention that some of the people think
that the reason for my efforts in developing the vibration data logger is to
"prove if the Corvair conversion is any good" THIS
IS ABSOLUTELY FALSE. WILLIAM'S STOCK CONVERSION IS A PROVEN DESIGN. PERIOD. I
am a FAA licensed power plant mechanic as well as an electrical engineer. I
have been instrumenting engines and ground vehicles for the past 15 years and I
have looked at data from all kinds of engines from all over the world including
aircraft engines modified for ground power units. I will tell you this. The
Corvair engine modified per Williams’s specifications, is a rugged, smooth
running engine and is as robust as any other that I have seen. I selected the
Corvair conversion after much study and analysis and I frankly think that, if
an engine is converted to Williams’s specification, it will perform better and
will last longer than an equivalent the O-200 for a lot less money. That
being said, why then am I building this logger? Well there are three reasons as
follows: 1)
This is experimental aviation and I did not build a "stock" William
conversion nor did Mark Langford and some of the other builders who are on the
test list. Some are Big Boy conversions; some have extended prop hubs and other
"enhancements/modifications" from the tried and proven 2700 design.
The data logger will show us some information about the impact of the
modifications from the "stock" build. 2)
No two builds or builders are exactly the same, however, you can determine
through a statistical analysis what a normally operating engine and propeller
combination should look like The system can provide a builder with a measure of
confidence that at least his/her build falls within the norm of the "stock"
conversion or if he/she is an experimenter, what is the impact of their
modifications. 3)
Future testing and enhancements. For those who really understand that this is
experimental aviation, the final reason should be clear. I plan to use a turbo
charger on my motor due to the altitude from which I must fly. I also want to
look at developing a fuel injection system for the engine. At some point in
time, someone has to experiment with these enhancements and collect data on
these modifications. These
are my reasons for this data logger. It is my understanding that the builders
who have agreed to have their motors instrumented are not out to prove if the
conversion is any good. For most of us, that particular question was settled
long ago before we built our motors. What we want to understand is the dynamics
of various installations and deviations from the standard stock build. You
may feel free to contact me at any time on this subject, and I will be happy to
discuss any issues relating to this subject. Just email me at (johnkearney @
att.net) remember to take out spaces. To
those who are "waiting to find out is the conversion is any good" do
not wait for this data logger project to complete because it never will be. For
as long as we continue to experiment with the engine, I hope that we will be
taking data to better understand the implications of our
"modifications" from the stock conversion.
|